Inclusion of Indigenous and Traditional Ecological Knowledge (ITEK) in the Polar Bear Range States (PBRS) as part of the ITEK Working Group
- Actions associated with ITEK Objective in the 2023-2025 biennial period
- Polar Bear threats linked to the Objective and how the Objective’s Actions will address them:
- Expected impact/ outcome of the ITEK workplan:
- How the progress toward the ITEK Objective will be evaluated
- Liaison with external bodies
- Expected dissemination of Deliverables and Outcome to stakeholders
- Potential Challenges and how they will be addressed (mitigation actions) [1]
ITEK Objective Leads
Caroline Ladanowski (Environment and Climate Change Canada,
Amalie Jessen (Ministry of Fisheries and Hunting, Greenland,
Actions associated with ITEK Objective in the 2023-2025 biennial period
(see top-left sidebar for further information on the actions)
ITEK-1: Maintain a compendium and schedule of ITEK studies.
ITEK-2: Complete a review and analysis to identify potential approaches to enhance implementation of Polar Bear Range States (PBRS) commitments to inclusion of Indigenous and Traditional Ecological Knowledge and participation of Indigenous peoples and provide recommendations.
ITEK-3: Prepare an ITEK knowledge synthesis on recent ITEK research.
Polar Bear threats linked to the Objective and how the Objective’s Actions will address them:
Seven key threats have been identified as already impacting, or most likely to have an impact on the polar bear and its habitat during the lifetime of the Range States Circumpolar Action Plan (CSP) (2015-2025). These threats are: climate change, human-caused mortality, mineral and energy resource exploration and development, contaminants and pollution, shipping, tourism related activities, and diseases and parasites. The threats may interact and have compound effects, so consideration should also be given to the cumulative impacts. The 2013 Declaration of the Responsible Ministers of the PBRS recognizes “the importance and value of Traditional Ecological Knowledge1 in informing management decisions and the need for the Range States to develop a common understanding of what constitutes Traditional Ecological Knowledge and how it should be used in polar bear management decisions.” As such, it is expected that ITEK-1, ITEK-2 and ITEK-3 will contribute cross-cuttingly to addressing the threats.
1 What the 2013 Ministerial Declaration refers to as “Traditional Ecological Knowledge” is now referred to as “Indigenous and Traditional Ecological Knowledge”.
Levels of the Threats:
Threats to polar bears classified according to their likelihood of impacting the species during the lifetime of the CAP (2015-2025) are available online at Polar Bear Range States - Threats to Polar Bears (polarbearagreement.org).
Expected impact/ outcome of the ITEK workplan:
ITEK- 1: Maintain a compendium and schedule of ITEK studies
The ITEK WG will maintain the RBRS ITEK Compendium by compiling guidance on the use of Indigenous and Traditional Ecological knowledge (ITEK) in decision-making (as well as best practices and research done related to ITEK), focusing specifically on wildlife management decision-making. The ITEK WG will maintain the PBRS schedule of ITEK studies by compiling existing, in-progress and planned ITEK studies related to polar bears and polar bear habitat. Both documents were updated in fall 2023 and published in April 2024. Both documents will also be updated by fall 2025.
ITEK-2: Complete a review and analysis to identify potential approaches to enhance implementation of PBRS commitments to inclusion of ITEK and participation of Indigenous peoples and provide recommendations
The ITEK Working Group will complete a review and analysis focused on identifying potential approaches to enhance the implementation of PBRS commitments relating to the participation of Indigenous peoples and inclusion of ITEK in international polar bear conservation (e.g., statements made in the 1973 Agreement, the 2013 Ministerial Declaration, and the 2015 CAP). The review and analysis will consider the successes and challenges encountered to date by the PBRS and be informed by both the PBRS compendium of guidelines and schedule of studies. The ITEK WG will develop recommendations for the Head of Delegations (HoDs) related to enhancing the inclusion of Indigenous peoples and ITEK in implementing the CAP and 1973 Agreement. The recommendations may also consider planned future activities of the PBRS, if appropriate.
ITEK-3: Prepare an ITEK knowledge synthesis on recent ITEK research.
The ITEK knowledge synthesis could take the form of an infographic or a series of infographics and could be shared on the PBRS website. This will allow the HoDs and other CAP Operating Teams and WGs to use what ITEK is available when undertaking their activities and actions. The knowledge synthesis may also help the HoDs identify gaps in ITEK of polar bears, which could in turn inform coordination and planning of research and monitoring.
How the progress toward the ITEK Objective will be evaluated
The finalization of the compendium, the creation of a draft report and the delivery of recommendations to the HoDs, and knowledge synthesis will determine the progress towards achieving the goals of Inclusion of ITEK in the PBRS for the CAP 2023-2025 period.
Performance Metrics
-
Completion and publication of the updated Compendium and schedule of ITEK studies (April 2024 and Fall 2025).
-
Provision of a draft report to the HoDs on the potential approaches to enhance implementation of PBRS commitments to inclusion of ITEK and participation of Indigenous peoples across all relevant objectives of the PBRS CAP 2023-2025 Implementation period. Provision of official recommendations to the HoDs on how to include Indigenous Peoples and ITEK in implementing the CAP and 1973 agreement.
-
Publication of knowledge synthesis infographic or a series of infographics.
Baseline of Performance Metrics
-
A “Compendium of existing Guidelines for the Use of TEK in decision Making” was finalized and posted on the Range State website in 2018. The updated compendium (link) and schedule of ITEK studies (link) were posted in April 2024; and will be updated by the end of the 2023-2025 CAP implementation period.
-
No baseline, drafting has not begun as of start of 2023-2025 CAP implementation period.
-
No baseline, drafting has not begun as of start of 2023-2025 CAP implementation period.
Liaison with other CAP-Objectives
ITEK-1 through 3 will help enhance the consideration of ITEK across all CAP objectives.
Liaison with external bodies
(i.e. organizations, communities, stakeholders, expert groups, etc.)
The diversity of the membership on the ITEK WG will facilitate the liaison with a multitude of organizations, communities, stakeholder and expert groups across the Range States as needed in order to achieve ITEK-1, ITEK-2 and ITEK-3.
Expected dissemination of Deliverables and Outcome to stakeholders
(public, policy makers, legislators etc.)
ITEK-1: Will be published online.
ITEK-2: Once finalized, may be published online.
ITEK-3: Once finalized, may be published online.
ITEK-1, ITEK-2 and ITEK-3 may be used by policy advisors to help inform policy decisions affecting polar bear management across the PBRS as applicable.
Potential Challenges and how they will be addressed (mitigation actions) [1]
1 – There is a growing body of ITEK that is being shared. It may be challenging to keep an up-to-date compendium and schedule of studies.
Mitigation measures: ITEK WG can consider the compendium and schedule of studies an evergreen document and in conjunction develops a system to review & update the compendium on an annual basis.
2 – There is a variety of levels of engagement currently across the PBRS with regards to the inclusion of ITEK in polar bear issues.
Mitigation measures: Provide regular opportunities at HoD meetings for PBRS members to discuss their individual vs. collective successes and challenges in including ITEK in Polar Bear issues. Ensure engagement is inclusive of all voices.
3 – Accurate interpretation of knowledge may be a challenge.
Mitigation measures: Ensure study authors are engaged from start to finish in the creation of any product.
[1] The level of challenge is estimated by multiplying the level of likelihood (scale 1-5) by the negative impact it may have (scale 1-5). Minor: 1-10, Moderate: 11-15; Severe: 16-25.